Answer: Donald J. Trump would likely support zoning changes to allow more affordable housing developments, but his support would be framed in terms of promoting economic growth and reducing excessive regulation. He might argue that restrictive zoning laws and bureaucratic red tape hinder development and contribute to the housing affordability crisis. Trump would likely emphasize the need to streamline regulations and make it easier for developers to build new housing, which could increase supply and drive down costs. He might also highlight the importance of protecting property rights and ensuring that local governments do not impose overly burdensome restrictions on land use. Additionally, Trump could stress the role of the private sector in addressing housing needs and advocate for public-private partnerships to encourage development.

Percentage of Importance: Given his focus on economic growth and reducing regulatory barriers, Trump might assign moderate to high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 60-70%. This reflects his belief in the importance of facilitating development and reducing government intervention to promote affordable housing.

Answer: Donald J. Trump would likely support the idea of investing in infrastructure improvements in underserved neighborhoods, but he might frame his support in terms of promoting economic development and job creation. He would probably emphasize the importance of revitalizing these areas to spur economic activity, attract businesses, and create employment opportunities. Trump might also advocate for public-private partnerships as a means to leverage private investment and expertise, thereby reducing the financial burden on the city while still achieving significant infrastructure improvements. He could highlight his past initiatives, such as the Opportunity Zones created under his administration, as examples of how government policies can stimulate private investment in underserved areas.

Percentage of Importance: Given his focus on economic development and the potential for job creation, Trump would likely assign moderate to high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 60-70%.