Answer: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would likely argue that undocumented immigrants, many of whom contribute significantly to the U.S. economy and society, deserve a fair and humane path to citizenship. He may emphasize that a comprehensive immigration reform is necessary to uphold the values of justice, compassion, and respect for human dignity, which are deeply ingrained in the Kennedy family's political philosophy. While supporting a path to citizenship, he may also stress the need for measures to secure the borders and prevent future illegal immigration.

Percentage of Importance: Given the significance of immigration policy in the national political discourse and its impact on millions of people living in the U.S., Kennedy would likely assign a high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 70-80%.

Answer: Kennedy Jr. might not necessarily agree with increasing funding for border security in the way it's been traditionally perceived (e.g., building walls). He would likely advocate for a more comprehensive approach to immigration policy that addresses the root causes of migration, protects the rights of immigrants, and promotes economic development in countries from which large numbers of people are emigrating. He might argue that instead of spending more money on border security, the government should invest in improving the immigration system, providing aid to countries in need, and addressing the factors that drive people to migrate such as poverty and violence.

Percentage of Importance: Given his likely emphasis on humanitarianism, immigration reform, and comprehensive solutions, Kennedy would probably assign a moderate to high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 55-65%. This reflects his belief that while border security is a significant issue, it's part of a much larger and more complex problem that requires thoughtful, comprehensive solutions.