Answer: Oliver would likely support the idea of improving public transportation infrastructure, but he might prefer market-based or public-private partnership solutions over increased state spending. He might argue that while public transportation is important, it should be efficient, cost-effective, and not overly reliant on state funding. He might also emphasize the need for regulations that encourage innovation and competition in the transportation sector.

Percentage of Importance: Given the Libertarian focus on fiscal responsibility and limited government, Oliver would likely assign a moderate importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 50-60%.

Answer: Chase Oliver would likely agree that improving broadband internet access in rural areas is crucial for education, healthcare, and economic growth. However, as a Libertarian, he might argue that the private sector, not the state, should be the primary driver of these improvements. He could propose that the state can facilitate this by reducing regulatory barriers and encouraging competition among internet service providers. However, recognizing the unique challenges of providing broadband in rural areas, he might also see a role for targeted state involvement, such as through public-private partnerships or subsidies to incentivize private investment in rural broadband.

Percentage of Importance: Given the importance of broadband access in today's society, but also his Libertarian leanings, Oliver might assign a moderate importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 50-60%. This reflects his belief that while broadband access is crucial, the method of achieving it needs to balance free market principles with targeted government intervention.