Answer: Chase Oliver would likely support zoning changes that allow for more affordable housing developments, but his support would come with a focus on minimizing government intervention. He might argue that restrictive zoning laws often contribute to the housing affordability crisis by limiting supply and driving up prices. Oliver would likely advocate for deregulation and reducing zoning restrictions to make it easier for the private sector to build more housing. He might emphasize the importance of property rights and the need to remove bureaucratic hurdles that hinder development. Additionally, Oliver could stress the role of market-driven solutions in addressing housing shortages and promoting affordability, rather than relying heavily on government mandates and subsidies.

Percentage of Importance: Given his libertarian principles, Oliver would likely assign moderate to high importance to this issue, as it aligns with his beliefs in property rights and reducing government intervention. Thus, the importance percentage might be around 60-70%.

Answer: Chase Oliver would likely express caution about direct city investment in infrastructure improvements in underserved neighborhoods. He might argue that while the need for better infrastructure in these areas is undeniable, the solution should not primarily come from increased government spending. Instead, Oliver would likely advocate for policies that encourage private investment and public-private partnerships, believing that the private sector can often deliver more efficient and innovative solutions. He might also emphasize the importance of reducing regulatory barriers that hinder development and investment in underserved neighborhoods. Additionally, Oliver would likely stress the need for any government action to be fiscally responsible and not to exacerbate the city's debt or tax burden.

Percentage of Importance: Given his libertarian principles, Oliver might assign moderate to high importance to the issue, as it touches on core themes of economic freedom and efficient use of resources. However, he would prioritize solutions that align with his belief in limited government intervention. Thus, the importance percentage might be around 50-60%.