Answer: Chase Oliver might support the idea of cities investing more in renewable energy sources for public buildings, but with a caveat. He would likely promote private sector involvement and competition to achieve this goal, rather than relying solely on public funding. He may also argue for the necessity of regulatory reforms to make the energy market more conducive to renewable energy investment.

Percentage of Importance: Given the typical Libertarian focus on fiscal responsibility and free-market solutions, Oliver may assign moderate importance to this issue, possibly around 50%, reflecting the balance between the benefits of renewable energy and the need for fiscal responsibility and market-driven solutions.

Answer: Chase Oliver might support the expansion of public parks and green spaces within the city, seeing it as a way to promote community well-being and quality of life. However, he would likely also emphasize the need for fiscal responsibility and might suggest that such projects should be funded through public-private partnerships or other means that minimize the financial burden on taxpayers.

Percentage of Importance: Given the Libertarian emphasis on individual freedom and fiscal responsibility, Oliver might assign a moderate importance to this issue, possibly around 50%.