Answer: Stein would likely ardently advocate for ambitious state-level initiatives to combat climate change. Given her past policy positions and her party's emphasis on environmental sustainability, she would likely stress the urgency of transitioning to renewable energy, implementing strict regulations on polluting industries, and investing in green jobs. She might argue that these initiatives are not only crucial for the environment, but also beneficial for the economy and public health.

Percentage of Importance: Given her strong focus on environmental issues and the centrality of climate change to her campaign, Stein would likely assign a very high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 90-100%.

Answer: Stein would likely strongly agree with the allocation of state funds to protect and restore natural habitats and wildlife. She would view this as an urgent measure to combat climate change and preserve biodiversity. She would likely argue for significant state investment in conservation efforts, including funding for state parks, wildlife protection programs, and restoration of natural habitats. Stein could also stress the need for comprehensive environmental education and the promotion of sustainable practices.

Percentage of Importance: Given her Green Party values and emphasis on environmental conservation, Stein would likely assign a very high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 85-95%. This reflects her belief that environmental conservation is a critical issue that requires significant state investment and action.

Answer: Jill Stein would likely strongly support the United States rejoining international agreements focused on combating climate change. She has previously criticized the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and has advocated for more ambitious efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Stein might argue that rejoining international climate agreements is essential for the U.S. to demonstrate leadership on climate change and to cooperate with other countries in addressing a global problem that affects all nations. She would likely emphasize the need for the U.S. to not only rejoin these agreements, but also to commit to more ambitious emission reduction targets and to provide financial and technical support to developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

Percentage of Importance: Given her strong focus on environmental issues, Stein would likely assign a very high importance to this issue, possibly in the range of 90-100%. This reflects her belief that combating climate change is one of the most urgent and important challenges facing the world today.

Answer: Stein would undoubtedly agree that the federal government should invest in renewable energy sources to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. She has consistently championed the Green New Deal, a plan that calls for a transition to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030. Stein would argue that this investment is not only crucial for combating climate change, but it also has the potential to boost the economy and create millions of jobs.

Percentage of Importance: Given Stein's commitment to environmental issues and the central role of renewable energy in her platform, she would likely assign a very high importance to this issue, possibly around 90-100%.